Orthopedic device development is a complex process that pulls inspiration and ideas from a variety of sources. The goal is to create a product that can be used within an existing procedure without disrupting the established routine while adding value through its use. However, when designing a complete system for a procedure, a different approach is required.

When creating instruments, implants, and other related products for a surgical procedure, the entire environment and actual surgery must be considered. This increases the complexity but can generate synergies not realized from using disparate tools and technologies that were created in more of a silo. Ultimately, a holistic offering can be provided.

To help further explain why a procedural solution may be a better approach, David Hannah, Chief Technology Officer at EXALTA, participated in this interview. In the following Q&A, he speaks to the difference in development approach, the benefit of input from surgeons and healthcare professionals, and how related aspects such as packaging are best handled.

Sean Fenske: Most projects involve the development of a single instrument or implant. Today, we’re discussing the development of a solution for a procedure. How does this alter the design/development phase?

David Hannah: It fundamentally changes the starting point. Instead of optimizing an individual instrument or implant, we start with the procedure and the entire surgical workflow. That means understanding how the surgeon, scrub tech, OR staff, instruments, implants, enabling technologies, and logistics all interact. We can then design the system around the…